~ Mathew Sanders – Professional Freelance Interaction Design & Strategy ~
Home | What people are saying | About Mathew Sanders | Prices | Availability & Contact
SERVICES   Webpage Refresh | Expert Review | Wireframe Design
BLOG   Nice Touchpoints Only

Posts Tagged ‘Concepts’

Woolworths Website Search Redesign

Saturday, November 21st, 2009
Yesterday I watched my friend’s mum who wanted to check some prices for products on the Woolworths/Countdown website.
After helping her with the first barrier to browsing the website (which is having to select your suburb so that accurate prices can be displayed) she was confused about where to go to find products.
There are three main pathways to display products, browsing aisles, searching for items, and using the ‘quick list’.
I found the search process particularly frustrating because before seeing a list of matching products, you have to choose a single ’shelf’ that products are categorised by, which seems to me a completely unnecessary step. Why not just show a unique list of all products that match the search term?
So I sat down and spent some time sketching out a few rough ideas then made the created the following concept for a search results page.
This concept hints at a few significant changes from the current design.
Search focused
Search is promoted as the main method of finding products. Instead of navigating down a hierarchy of departments, aisles, and shelf as the current website requires (or any other categorisation), this concept requires people to use keywords to search for matching products.
Dynamic filtering
This may lead to a wider range of items in the search results and so aisle categorisations can then be used as a way to filter search results.
Current order not displayed
The current design shows a side bar with the current order. As the size of the order increases only a portion of the current order is shown at any single time. Instead of trying to fit this onto the current page I’ve opted to having a dedicated page for viewing and modifying the contents of the current order.
Cross sell
An experience that the current website fails to capture from shopping in-store is the ability to be exposed to store specials are you’re browsing the aisles. The current website does include some banner advertising to promote specific products but they are limited. Instead this concept suggests cross-sell by dynamically displaying featured products from nearby product families of the current search result. In the sample concept someone has searched for hummus, but a special for aioli is also shown.
Overall this is only a quick concept, but likely misses some key business or technological challenges or objectives that come with supermarket e-commerce, but it was something that I had some fun with this afternoon, I think that a supermarket website would be a fun project to be involved with!
What are your frustrations with supermarket websites? What ideas would you like to see supermarkets implement online?

Yesterday I watched my friend’s mum who wanted to check some prices for products on the Woolworths/Countdown website.

After helping her with the first barrier to browsing the website (which is having to select your suburb so that accurate prices can be displayed) she was confused about where to go to find products.

There are three main pathways to display products, browsing aisles, searching for items, and using the ‘quick list’.

I found the search process particularly frustrating because before seeing a list of matching products, you have to choose a single ’shelf’ that products are categorised by, which seems to me a completely unnecessary step. Why not just show a unique list of all products that match the search term?

So I sat down and spent some time sketching out a few rough ideas then made the created a concept for a search results page which hints at a few significant changes from the current design…

Download the concept (1 page, PDF, 578 KB) or see some highlights below.

Search focused

Search is promoted as the main method of finding products. Instead of navigating down a hierarchy of departments, aisles, and shelf as the current website requires (or any other categorisation), this concept requires people to use keywords to search for matching products.

Dynamic filtering

This may lead to a wider range of items in the search results and so aisle categorisations can then be used as a way to filter search results.

Current order details not displayed

The current design shows a side bar with the current order. As the size of the order increases only a portion of the current order is shown at any single time. Instead of trying to fit this onto the current page I’ve opted to having a dedicated page for viewing and modifying the contents of the current order.

Cross sell

An experience that the current website fails to capture from shopping in-store is the ability to be exposed to store specials are you’re browsing the aisles. The current website does include some banner advertising to promote specific products but they are limited. Instead this concept suggests cross-sell by dynamically displaying featured products from nearby product families of the current search result. In the sample concept someone has searched for hummus, but a special for aioli is also shown.

Overall this is only a quick concept, but likely misses some key business or technological challenges or objectives that come with supermarket e-commerce, but it was something that I had some fun with this afternoon, I think that a supermarket website would be a fun project to be involved with!

What are your frustrations with supermarket websites? What ideas would you like to see supermarkets implement online?

How Contact Energy lost $97,275 – by chasing $25

Sunday, June 14th, 2009

Contact Energy LogoIt took six months from signing up as a customer with Contact Energy before I got my first power bill.

The bill arrived when I was away from home so I missed on the 10% early bird discount, and the next month my bill also included a late payment processing fee.

It was a nominal fee, but I’m quite stubborn when it comes to principles, so between arriving home from work and heading to the gym I called the Contact Energy contact centre expecting that it would be quite a simple matter to resolve.

15 minutes later I’d explained my situation to the customer service representative yet again (I’d made multiple calls over that six months querying when I’d receive my first bill and with each call I had to tell the same story from beginning to end) and I’d still failed to convince this person that given the circumstances I’d been unfairly charged. So while the contact center representative started telling me something that didn’t seem very relevant I lost all patience.

“okay, I’ve got to go now” and hung up.

In retrospect, that was pretty rude of me, but for me that point represented a six month build up of tension of making calls, never hearing back from Contact Energy, never knowing if my power was about to be disconnected, anxiety about what a 6 month power bill was going to be like, and that exact moment also feeling grumpy that I was going to be made late for the gym.

That phone call was the pivotal point in my relationship with Contact Energy. If that call had gone differently, and the $25 fee dismissed in the context of situation I most likely still be a Contact Energy customer today, and quite likely for the rest of my life.

But instead, I paid the fee and when Powershop opened it’s virtual doors to new customers I was one of the first in line to sign up as a customer.

Electricity is probably the most basic of commodities in the modern western world. Regardless of who you buy it from, there is no difference in the current that flows into your home, and the only real difference is the pricing plan that you’re charged – which is often minimal. And because it’s perceived to be a pain to switch power companies once you’re a customer you’ll often stick with them for life.

There’s a strong chance that I’m going to be an electricity consumer for another 50 years and without even factoring in increasing electricity usage, $97,275 is a quick and rough estimation of my remaining lifetime value as an electricity consumer.

What could have Contact Energy done to avoid this?

Recongise the life value of a customer

Firstly they don’t seem to have recognised the difference between immediate value (receiving a nominal extra $25 fee) and long-term benefits (at least $97,275 for the rest of my life). Strategically speaking because hunting around and switching power companies is a very unusual consumer behaviour, Contact Energy should really be doing their best not to loose customers switching to another company.

Give front line staff the tools they need to make practical decisions

I hung up on the contact centre representative because I was frustrated and angry. But I don’t think that the this person was being lazy, mean, or ignorant – they simply didn’t have the full picture of what was happening. They were speaking to me for the first time, and very likely had no easy access to the fact that I’d frequently called over the past 6 months and had previous frustrating calls. And the next time that I called, that person didn’t know anything about how rude and frustrated I’d been on the previous call.

Having this knowledge would have undoubtedly helped Contact Energy deal with me in a more appropriate way and keep me as a customer.

Remember me

With each call I made I had to start from the beginning and explain my story from the start. After not long it felt like I was a living broken record stuck on repeat and not making any progress. This moved from being just mildly annoying to frustrating to just plain exhausting.

There has been a lot of talk about customer relationship management (CRM) software in contact centers as being the golden bullet to long term loyalty, and in the same breath as being too complicated and expensive to implement.

I believe that there are a lot of smaller steps that can be made that still give a lot of value in helping contact center staff deal appropriately with customers.

For one, it’s common requirement for staff to categorise their call at the end in a call wrap where so that the organisation can have knowledge about why people are calling:

Instead of doing that, what if staff were asked to note what they think their caller felt at the end of the call?

Or what if staff we asked to record how they felt at the end of a call, and for a call where they ended feeling frustrated they were given some time to compose themselves before going straight into the next call?

In either case, this knowledge could be recored and used to help the next consultant adjust their approach when dealing next time that person calls, for instance by displaying a call history of that customer that gives an at-a-glance view of the duration of pervious calls, when they occurred, and how the consultant felt at the end of the call:

This isn’t a huge investment in technology, but it’s a quick way to give customer service staff important feedback about previous calls and armed with this knowledge, staff would be better prepared in dealing with this next call.

What is the worst experience you’ve had with contact centre service staff? What do you think would have changed the situation for the better? let me know by adding your comment!

Dear Hoyts: here’s 5 tips on showing movie times on your website

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

I’m not a movie buff. I can’t hold a decent conversation on directors or movie stars (except Meryl Streep – who, is obviously amazing) BUT I’m addicted to going to the movies. And that makes me one of your ideal customers.

But Hoyts, your website is a truly awful mess. I really, really hate using it. And because of that, I don’t think I see as many movies as I otherwise would. If you’re frustrating me, you’ll be frustrating other people too, and because of that your website is limiting your revenue potential.  As a friend I’ve got some tips that I think might help…

(more…)

Concept: Litter Bins That Change Behaviour

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008

In public places like beaches and parks, littering continues to be a problem.

It’s an environmental issue, and in New Zealand ‒ where a significant driver of tourism into the country is through the promise of a 100% Pure New Zealand ‒ it’s also an economical issue (a 2001 report from the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment estimated that a lowered perception of New Zealand’s clean and green image could have a negative impact approaching $1 billion dollars).

Common touchpoints designed to prevent littering are providing rubbish bins, and also signs. When signs are used, there are a range of approaches in the messages used to prevent littering:

The Polite Request

The Direct Order

The Demonstration Of How To Not Litter

The Social Reminder

The Threat


What would happen if instead concentrating on touchpoints that aim to prevent people from littering, touchpoints also had the aim of encouraging people to clean up – regardless of the source of the litter?

During my University years I met Gael Arnold, an amazing woman who took a lot of her own time, money and effort into organising volunteer parties to clean up litter that had washed up on the shores of islands in Auckland’s Hauraki Gulf. Since then I have made an attempt to take away as much rubbish that I can hold whenever I leave a beach.

This behaviour should be actively encouraged!

What if rubbish bins were designed to also dispense plastic bags and disposable gloves that people could use to collect rubbish in an area before they leave. Perhaps these bins could be designed with cartoons or imagery that educate children about the benefits of collecting litter and encourage them to take part as well, or challenge them to collect as much litter as possible (litter treasure hunt anyone?) well maybe that’s a long reach, but kids do like games right?

A similar concept for specialised bins exists for dog owners where special dog poop collection bins are placed in areas where people walk dogs which also dispense plastic bags for dog owners to collect their dog’s waste if they’ve not brought their own bags. The message here is “you have no excuse“.

It’s true you probably wouldn’t see an overnight change in people who littered in the past to start cleaning up other peoples litter just from a well designed bin like I’ve described above. But seeing other people act is a powerful motivator. When people don’t litter there is nothing obvious to see (except a lack of litter) but observing other people actively cleaning up might prove to the type of social reminder that is needed to prevent these people from littering themselves.

New Zealand has a long running “Be A Tidy Kiwi” campaign, one of the aims over the next three years is to “Maximise use of litter bins by designing them well“. I’d love to see a trial of rubbish bins that were designed with affordances to encourage people to clean up other peoples litter.

Some people might object to the use of so much plastic (in the dispensed bags and gloves) as a proposed solution to litter. Others might argue the extra cost involved in providing the bags and gloves. I’d love to hear your thoughts on this problem.

Design for change!

Concept: Family Doctor Examination Notes

Wednesday, November 26th, 2008

Following the confusion that came from my recent visit to the family doctor, I decided to mock up a quick concept of a touchpoint that patients could receive after seeing a doctor.

The main features of this letter include:

  • Contact details in the header that include opening hours
  • Main focus on what happened during the visit
  • What is going to happen next
  • What to do in the mean time (note the specifics of 2 liters of water instead of the vague ‘keep fluids high’)
  • The patients contact details – so the patient can review and correct if needed

I also included as a watermark area of the page a recent campaign message that local DHBs are communicating, in this case education around after hours emergency services.

Ideally, a letter like this should be able to be generated with minimal additional effort from clinical staff by using information that is already being entered into a patient file.

As part of process, the letter should be reviewed and signed by a clinical staff member to add ownership and responsibility to the touchpoint – hopefully this would avoid situations where 71 year old men are told they are pregnant!

Home | What people are saying | Wireframe Design | Webpage Refresh/Makeover | Website Fitness Plan | Prices | Contact | Blog

This work by Mathew Sanders is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 New Zealand License